Core requirements
Return to the complete review sequence.
Updated September 29, 2026 · Official sources are linked where cited · Development guidance; no qualified legal or regulatory review.
COSMETIC WARNINGS
A generic warning library cannot decide what a cosmetic needs. Review the finished formula, intended and foreseeable use, package, directions, user groups, and current product-specific rules before approving the final statement.
Run a free cosmetic pre-checkKeep the analysis tied to current facts. More warning text is not always safer: vague or excessive boilerplate can hide the statement users actually need and can conflict with the intended-use evidence.
Check the exact wording, location, type size, contrast, and proximity to directions on every package layer where it must appear. Inspect a final-size proof and the assembled container. If a peel-back label, carton, shrink band, or small package affects access to the warning, record how a consumer encounters the information before use.
Fictional example: an aerosol cosmetic uses a flammable propellant, but the draft carries only “For external use.” That generic statement does not show that the team evaluated the pressurized package, ignition hazards, directions, storage, foreseeable misuse, and product-specific provisions in Part 740. Assemble the formula and safety evidence, container specification, use instructions, distribution conditions, and final artwork before selecting any warning text.
Document which hazard each statement addresses, the source used, and where a consumer sees it before use. If the evidence cannot establish the applicable warning, keep the release blocked. This example describes the review sequence and does not provide approved warning language.
Return to the complete review sequence.
Reconcile the finished formula and declared ingredients.
Check whether directions and claims change intended use.
Find evidence and artwork gaps before release.
Editorial status: Source-linked educational guide; no legal or regulatory approval.
Updated